SWR bridge with noise source

In this demonstration we measure the standing wave ratio (SWR) of a load, in this case an UHF antenna. A constraint is that we want to do this in a cost-effective way up to 1.7 GHz. My earlier discussed VNA is not capable of doing this, you can get VNAs that can but they rapidly become rather expensive.

In the demonstration video we generate noise with a tool that essentially amplifies the noise of a zener diode, you could make it yourself, but if you google for BG7TBL noise generator then you will soon find out it is easier to order it than to build it yourself. Noise from the BG7TBL tool has the property that it is random phase by frequency and that the amplitude is somewhat constant over the entire spectrum. Put it on the scope and you get what you expect: something that resembles white noise. The tool needs up to 12 Volt to operate, it will get hot, but it also works on a 9 Volt battery.

If you insert noise in the SDR (I used my airspy) then it will fill the entire HF VHF and UHF spectrum, and you may wonder why you would like to do that at all. Please insert attenuators because the output of the BG7TBL tool is rather high, so I added 30 dB attenuation before I did the measurement with the SDR. When I measure the reflection properties of a load then 10dB goes before the bridge, and 20 dB goed after the bridge to prevent that the bridge is influenced too much.

There is a very good reason why you would like to insert artificial noise into your SDR. The reason is that it allows you to measure the performance of filters or loads connected in between the source and the receiver. In the video we inserted a RF bridge between the source and the receiver.

The RF bridge comes from the transverter store on ebay, see the movie, also there the conclusion is, it is easier to buy one than to make one. The bridge has an input, an output, there is a reference port and there is a device under test port. There are only SMA connectors on the PCB, the schematic is as follows:

On the input (left in the schematic) you insert a signal into the RF bridge, and on the reference port (top port in the schematic) you insert a nominal dummy load of 50 Ohm. On the output of the RF bridge (right port in the schematic) you measure the throughput with your SDR (an airspy). There are now several possibilities depending on what you connected to the DUT port (bottom port in the schematic):

  1. Nothing is connected to the DUT port, in this case the signal reflects back into the RF bridge and this is picked up by the receiver. The throughput is called the directivity of the RF bridge. (for details see the discussion on the transverter-store web page).
  2. The DUT port has a dummy load of 50 Ohm (or the same amount of Ohm as the reference port). In this case you will notice that no signal will pass the bridge and that everything is dissipated in the dummy load at the DUT port.
  3. Connect an unknown load to the DUT port, and now you will see that some of the signal is reflected back to the receiver, but that the rest of the signal is dissipated into the load on the DUT port.

With the first and the second measurement you calibrate the set-up, with the third measurement you can see who much dB is dissipated in the unknown load. You can measure this in the waterfall plot, and hence you can measure the so-called reflection loss RL in decibel caused by the unknown load. Next you need to convert the RL into a SWR value, the equation is as folows:

RL = 20 log10( (SWR-1)/(SWR+1) )

I measured on the waterfall a reflection loss of 20 dB near 440 MHz, this is compatible with a SWR of 1.2, the connected antenna is a miniature version of a 70 cm amateur band antenna.

Last update: 23-5-2018


Fieldday 21-May-2018

Last day of the May vacation, let’s hike to the city park. Half of the time you are explaining what hamradio is to the general public.

One bag, it weighs 20 kg due to the battery
Glass fiber mast with tuner in the park
The FT-857D, I love this radio, the battery is a bit heavy
Overview park
The radials that you really need
All packed together to transport.


6-5-2018: We see a lot of fading, and the waterfall plots contain the typical stripes:


Fading (or QSB) is a phenomenon where the strength (and phase) of  the received signal changes over time.

The first plot shows a waterfall on the 80 meter band recorded on May the 6th 2018, this is a UK station some 370 km West of me. Fading often shows as a pattern of stripes, typically the repetition interval is 30 seconds or so.

It is not uncommon that multiple ranges of the spectrum of the radio transmission are affected at the same time. You miss a part of the high tones, the middle and the low tones at the same time, it is as if three notch filters slowly slide over the audio spectrum.

During fading several wavefronts arrive at the antenna, upon arrival they can add-up or they may cancel one another, in physics this is called interference.

So what type of interference mechanisms are known? This is the HF and we are talking about long waves, with the station in the UK we can expect a direct wave over the ground and a reflecting wave via the ionosphere. Both waves will interact.

Another possible mechanism on the HF is that only the properties of the reflecting layer are changing during the transmission. This is known as Faraday rotation in the ionosphere causing a change in the polarization of radiowaves. Any antenna has a preference to polarization, changes in the Faraday rotation will affect the received signal strength.

Interaction between the ground and the skywave could explain what is probably going on in the first plot. The critical frequency is around 2.5 MHz and we are near 3.8 MHz, furthermore at 370 km you can still expect a groundwave.

In my experience the pattern of stripes is typical for nearby stations where the ground and the skywave interfere. QSB manifests itself differently for more distant stations where the radio signal may arrive after multiple reflections involving the ionosphere. In the latter case you see that the signal strength varies, but you wouldn’t see the stripes.

9-5-2018: when you think about theory to explain what you saw then it is always good to look again at the observations and ask yourself whether the theory is still valid. Here is the waterfall spectrum of a QSO with EA3BOX Juan who is too far away for me for a groundwave, but still you see the fading stripes, which is the faraday rotation in the ionosphere. The critical frequency was 3,475 MHz at this time, here is the waterfall plot:


I also attached the ionograph of Dourbes (Belgium) at the time of this QSO, I don’t claim that I fully understand what I see in the ionographs, but the most important number is the foF2 which is the critical frequency, and other important ones are the MUF at the bottom legend.


If someone has a manual or a better explanation of what you see in the ionographs then it would be appreciated.

Last update: 9-May-2018

Impedantie 7.451 MHz crystal

So here it is, The impedance of the cruystal measured with the metrovna:

impedantie kristal
Shown: light blue is the impedance in Ohm, and green is the phase, red is the reflection coefficient. Span is 10 kHz, from -5 kHz to +5 kHz centered at 7.447 kHz.

And here, the crystal is used as a filter, we measure the transmission characteristics:

Red: reflection loss, Green: phase, Yellow: transmission loss.

Last update: 22-April-2018

Field day at Maasvlakte

Antenna: 10 meter glasfiber pole with an antenna tuner at the base. Couple of radials. It is an easy solution that always works: 17 QSOs in a 5 hours, conditions were mediocre.


The weather was just too good to let this opportunity pass by, blue sky beach weather in April, what more do you wish. Here is the log, worked the 40, 20 and 17 meter, heard some Canadians and Americans, but no QSO was established.

Screen Shot 2018-04-20 at 10.39.58

Last update: 20-April-2018